Publishers Need to Stress Quality, Not Quantity
Selection by word-count is senseless.
I appreciated the candor of the book agent’s rejection letter:
“A manuscript of 27,024 words is barely considered a novella. In print it would only be around 80 pages. Most novels in the marketplace are between 80,000 and 100,000 words.”
My novel’s manuscript eventually came to 39,598 words, which is far below the cut-off point set by many agents. One literary agent said he wouldn’t consider any manuscript that was less than 64,000 words. That barrier is widely applied.
If that arbitrary standard had been applied in the past, we would not have had the chance to read Animal Farm; Fahrenheit 451; Heart of Darkness; Jonathan Livingston Seagull; Lord of the Flies; The Little Prince; The Old Man and the Sea; The Pearl; and The Screwtape Letters.
The screening kicks in at the agent level. The old days of “over the transom” submissions are dead. Most publishers require that manuscripts be submitted via agents. If the agents are saying no, then the author is blocked.
That was what I faced with my latest book: Pilate’s Magician: A Novel of the Resurrection.
Although the novel is about a reclusive Roman lawyer who is asked by Pontius Pilate to review decisions made during the trial of Jesus, I was determined that readers not be swamped with legalese, philosophy, or theology. Clarity without oversimplification was needed and yet, at the same time, it was important to cite the numerous mistakes that led to a crucifixion without a guilty verdict.
This approach was taken for several reasons.
After reading a novel, I have never said, “This book could have used another three or four thousand words.”
I believe that setting a minimum word-count on novels is the equivalent of setting a minimum color-count on paintings.
Finally, my primary rule for fiction or nonfiction is simple: Get to the point.
I decided to bypass collecting rejection slips and publish the novel on Amazon.
Is my book fancy? No. But it is well-written.
Is it in the bookstores? Not at this point. Give me time. It is available at Amazon.
Is the novel getting good reviews? As a matter of fact, it is, and one reason is the book’s clarity. Clarity that was in part produced by the absence of “padding.”
That should not be surprising because there are times when less is more.
I’ll close by simply begging the literary agents and editors of the world to go back to their roots and revive why they went into the publishing biz.
They did not go there to count words, but to discover and develop talent while producing great books.
Let this be their liberating slogan:
Word-Count? No!
High Quality? Yes!
We’ll all benefit from that.


Brevity is the soul of wit!
Good luck and persevere!
Have lately seen a flood of writings on the internet that have what I am coming to recognize as hallmarks of AI: over-long and repetitive narrative (common to much of what passes on the internet), inability to maintain continuity of the story, and something I struggle to describe, not because of what is there, but because of what it lacks.
My parallel is, strangely, coffee. I used to buy a lot of it - thousands of pounds - so had to do a lot of tasting and learning.
"OK coffee" is, well, OK. A lot comes from Central America - we called those "Central American Mild." A good base but a flat-ish flavor profile. It turns out that our pallets appreciate something I call "spiky" tastes. I suspect the same is true of textures - we love and crave a little bit of crunch in an otherwise uniform bite of food for example.
I really like Columbian coffee, but back in business we would over-roast a small percentage and blend those beans in to create some harsh flavor notes. Notes is a good word for it - contributes to the melody.
Even today I buy a good basic Columbian coffee and blend in about 25% espresso beans to get something I like.
Maybe good writing is like good coffee!